2004 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1990 Maserati Royale
To start off, 2004 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Maserati Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Maserati Royale would be higher. At 4,930 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Maserati Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Maserati Royale (296 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Maserati Royale should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 11 kg more than 1990 Maserati Royale.
Because 2004 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Maserati Royale. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Cherokee | 1990 Maserati Royale | |
| Make | Jeep | Maserati |
| Model | Cherokee | Royale |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1990 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3698 cc | 4930 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1951 kg | 1940 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2810 mm |
