2004 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2003 Spyker C8
To start off, 2004 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 3,999 cc, 2003 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 601 kg more than 2003 Spyker C8.
Because 2004 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Spyker C8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Cherokee | 2003 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Jeep | Spyker |
Model | Cherokee | C8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3698 cc | 3999 cc |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1951 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 100 L |