2004 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 187 kg more than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. (360 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Cherokee | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | Cherokee | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2031 kg | 1844 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.4 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 87 L |