2004 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 2,427 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 740 kg more than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Cherokee (215 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Livina. (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Cherokee | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Cherokee | Livina |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2427 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 215 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.9 seconds | 12.9 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1817 kg | 1077 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 52 L |