2004 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2009 Kia Optima

To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 2,427 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Optima (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. (144 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Cherokee.

Because 2004 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Kia Optima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Optima (229 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. (215 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Jeep Cherokee 2009 Kia Optima
Make Jeep Kia
Model Cherokee Optima
Year Released 2004 2009
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2427 cc 2359 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 144 HP 175 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 215 Nm 229 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.1:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4810 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1870 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.9 L/100km 9.6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 62 L