2004 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2009 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Golf (207 HP) has 59 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Golf should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Cherokee.
Because 2004 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Volkswagen Golf. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volkswagen Golf. (281 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volkswagen Golf.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Cherokee | 2009 Volkswagen Golf | |
| Make | Jeep | Volkswagen |
| Model | Cherokee | Golf |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 207 HP |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.4 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
