2004 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 3,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 74 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. (207 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Cherokee.
Because 2004 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. (312 Nm). This means 2011 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. 2004 Jeep Cherokee has automatic transmission and 2011 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2011 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Jeep Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Cherokee | 2011 Holden UTE | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Cherokee | UTE |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3698 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |