2004 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2012 BMW X5

To start off, 2012 BMW X5 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 3,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW X5 (300 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW X5 weights approximately 299 kg more than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW X5 (406 Nm @ 1300 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2012 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Jeep Cherokee 2012 BMW X5
Make Jeep BMW
Model Cherokee X5
Year Released 2004 2012
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3698 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 207 HP 300 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 312 Nm 406 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 1300 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD AWD
Transmission Type Automatic 8-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1951 kg 2250 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4854 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1933 mm
Vehicle Height 1870 mm 1775 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 2933 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 85 L