2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1956 Maserati 300
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati 300 would be higher. At 3,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Maserati 300 (242 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Maserati 300 should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1143 kg more than 1956 Maserati 300.
Because 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Maserati 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1956 Maserati 300 | |
| Make | Jeep | Maserati |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | 300 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 3965 cc | 2992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1899 kg | 756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 990 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2320 mm |
