2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1957 MG Magnett
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 MG Magnett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 MG Magnett would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1957 MG Magnett. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1957 MG Magnett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 664 kg more than 1957 MG Magnett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 MG Magnett. (113 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 MG Magnett.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1957 MG Magnett | |
| Make | Jeep | MG |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Magnett |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1957 |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 113 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2600 mm |
