2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1967 MG 1100
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 MG 1100 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1967 MG 1100. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1967 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 924 kg more than 1967 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 MG 1100. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1967 MG 1100 | |
| Make | Jeep | MG |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | 1100 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2380 mm |
