2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1967 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1324 kg more than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (38 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1967 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Fronte |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 356 cc |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 20 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 38 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 1970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 66 L |