2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1972 MG MGB
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 MG MGB would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1972 MG MGB. (97 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1972 MG MGB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 798 kg more than 1972 MG MGB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 MG MGB. (149 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 MG MGB.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1972 MG MGB | |
Make | Jeep | MG |
Model | Grand Cherokee | MGB |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1002 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2320 mm |