2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1978 Mitsubishi Lancer. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1978 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 940 kg more than 1978 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mitsubishi Lancer. (85 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1978 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Lancer |
Year Released | 2004 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1238 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2350 mm |