2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1978 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1978 Toyota Mark II. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1978 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 569 kg more than 1978 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1978 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Mark II |
Year Released | 2004 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2590 mm |