2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1979 Lancia Beta
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1979 Lancia Beta. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1979 Lancia Beta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 724 kg more than 1979 Lancia Beta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Lancia Beta. (171 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1979 Lancia Beta | |
Make | Jeep | Lancia |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Beta |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 59 L |