2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1979 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1979 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 840 kg more than 1979 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda RX-2. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1979 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Grand Cherokee | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2480 mm |