2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1981 Lada Niva
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Lada Niva would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1981 Lada Niva. (76 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1981 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 612 kg more than 1981 Lada Niva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Lada Niva. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1981 Lada Niva | |
Make | Jeep | Lada |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Niva |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1452 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1152 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 43 L |