2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1981 Mazda 323
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1981 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 950 kg more than 1981 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda 323. (79 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1981 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 323 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1069 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 79 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2370 mm |