2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (123 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 444 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (203 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Jeep | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |
