2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 978 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 9 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 38 L |