2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (53 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1014 kg more than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (96 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Jeep | Volkswagen |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Polo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 72 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 55 L |