2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1984 Talbot 1510
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Talbot 1510. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Talbot 1510 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP) has 132 more horse power than 1984 Talbot 1510. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1984 Talbot 1510. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 684 kg more than 1984 Talbot 1510. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Talbot 1510. (120 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Talbot 1510.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1984 Talbot 1510 | |
Make | Jeep | Talbot |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 1510 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1984 |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 63 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |