2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1989 TVR S2
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 TVR S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 TVR S2 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1989 TVR S2. (151 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1989 TVR S2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 864 kg more than 1989 TVR S2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 TVR S2. (220 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 TVR S2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1989 TVR S2 | |
| Make | Jeep | TVR |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | S2 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 151 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2290 mm |
