2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL (231 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 74 kg more than 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL. (268 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Grand Cherokee | SL |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2962 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 231 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 268 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 88.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 80.3 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 80 L |