2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1995 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1995 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1995 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 909 kg more than 1995 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Renault Clio. (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1995 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 38 L |