2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1997 Rover 200
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1997 Rover 200. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 734 kg more than 1997 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 200. (128 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1997 Rover 200 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 200 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |