2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1998 Acura CL
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura CL would be higher. At 3,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura CL (200 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 319 kg more than 1998 Acura CL.
Because 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Acura CL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1998 Acura CL | |
Make | Jeep | Acura |
Model | Grand Cherokee | CL |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3965 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 200 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1899 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 65 L |