2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1998 Mazda 323
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 709 kg more than 1998 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda 323. (109 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1998 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 323 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 109 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 55 L |