2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1998 Subaru Vivio
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Subaru Vivio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Subaru Vivio would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1998 Subaru Vivio. (43 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1998 Subaru Vivio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1114 kg more than 1998 Subaru Vivio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Subaru Vivio. (54 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Subaru Vivio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1998 Subaru Vivio | |
Make | Jeep | Subaru |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Vivio |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 54 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2320 mm |