2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1999 Suzuki X90
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki X90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki X90 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1999 Suzuki X90. (96 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1999 Suzuki X90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 664 kg more than 1999 Suzuki X90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki X90. (132 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki X90.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1999 Suzuki X90 | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | X90 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1589 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 132 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 90 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2210 mm |
