2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus Extreme. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus Extreme would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (120 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus Extreme. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1344 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (180 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Extreme |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 700 cc |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 180 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2420 mm |