2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2000 Seat Salsa
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Seat Salsa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Seat Salsa would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Salsa (247 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Salsa should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 194 kg more than 2000 Seat Salsa.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Seat Salsa. (302 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Seat Salsa.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2000 Seat Salsa | |
| Make | Jeep | Seat |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Salsa |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 90.3 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2590 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 55 L |
