2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2002 Suzuki Twin
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki Twin. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki Twin would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Twin. (42 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Twin. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1164 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Twin. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Twin. (57 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Twin.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2002 Suzuki Twin | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Twin |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 42 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 57 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 60.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 2740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 1810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 21 L |