2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2004 Subaru Outback
To start off, both 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2004 Subaru Outback were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Subaru Outback (212 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 150 kg more than 2004 Subaru Outback.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Subaru Outback. (285 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2004 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Jeep | Subaru |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Outback |
Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 285 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 64 L |