2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2006 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2006 Nissan Almera is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP) has 87 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Almera. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Almera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 224 kg more than 2006 Nissan Almera. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Almera. (138 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2006 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Almera |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1597 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 138 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 60 L |