2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2006 Renault Laguna
To start off, 2006 Renault Laguna is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2006 Renault Laguna. (131 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Laguna. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 768 kg more than 2006 Renault Laguna. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Laguna. (188 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Laguna.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2006 Renault Laguna | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Laguna |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 70 L |