2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2007 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2007 Holden Commodore is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2007 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Jeep | Holden |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
