2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2009 Honda CR-V

To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2009 Honda CR-V. (148 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 296 kg more than 2009 Honda CR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda CR-V. (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda CR-V.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2009 Honda CR-V
Make Jeep Honda
Model Grand Cherokee CR-V
Year Released 2004 2009
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3966 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 195 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 312 Nm 192 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 99 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 87 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.8:1 10.0:1
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1764 kg 1468 kg
Vehicle Length 4610 mm 4570 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1770 mm 1720 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2640 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.1 L/100km 9.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 78 L 58 L