2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 720 kg more than 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 0 HP |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1475 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2550 mm |
