2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2010 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2010 Mini Cooper is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mini Cooper (208 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mini Cooper should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 539 kg more than 2010 Mini Cooper.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mini Cooper. (260 Nm @ 1850 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2010 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Jeep | Mini |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Cooper |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1850 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3713 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1684 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1407 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2466 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 50 L |