2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2010 Peugeot 3008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 3008 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 3008. (148 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 3008.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 3008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2010 Peugeot 3008 | |
| Make | Jeep | Peugeot |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | 3008 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1837 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1639 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2613 mm |
