2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2010 Peugeot 407
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 407 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 407 (208 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 407 should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 560 kg more than 2010 Peugeot 407.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 407. (290 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 407.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2010 Peugeot 407 | |
Make | Jeep | Peugeot |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 407 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1204 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 67 L |