2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2011 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2011 Chrysler 200 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2011 Chrysler 200. (173 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2011 Chrysler 200.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chrysler 200. (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chrysler 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2011 Chrysler 200 | |
| Make | Jeep | Chrysler |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | 200 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 225 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4869 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2766 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 64 L |
