2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2011 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2011 SsangYong Rexton. (183 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2011 SsangYong Rexton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 251 kg more than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 SsangYong Rexton (402 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2011 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Jeep | SsangYong |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Rexton |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 402 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 17.5:1 |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 2015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 78 L |