2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2011 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2011 Subaru Outback is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Subaru Outback (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 156 kg more than 2011 Subaru Outback.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Subaru Outback (335 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2011 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Jeep | Subaru |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Outback |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 335 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1608 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2741 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 70 L |