2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2012 Citroen C3
To start off, 2012 Citroen C3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP) has 123 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C3. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 589 kg more than 2012 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C3. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2012 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Jeep | Citroen |
Model | Grand Cherokee | C3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1211 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 45 L |