2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 149 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2012 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Jeep | Holden |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Calais |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
