2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2012 Mazda BT-50. (154 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda BT-50.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 180 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3010 mm |
