2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2012 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2012 Nissan NP300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2012 Nissan NP300. (112 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan NP300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 234 kg more than 2012 Nissan NP300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan NP300. (169 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan NP300.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2012 Nissan NP300 | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Grand Cherokee | NP300 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 169 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 75 L |